China vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Manure management

China
2.07 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa
2.06 million kg
in 2023
China rank
5th
Middle Africa rank
3rd

Mules and Asses — Manure management over time

  • China
  • Middle Africa
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 2.07 million kg against 2.06 million kg in Middle Africa, a difference of 10,600 kg.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 5th and Middle Africa ranks 3rd of 125 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 9.49 million kg 173,754 kg 9.32 million kg China
1970s 12.10 million kg 161,279 kg 11.94 million kg China
1980s 15.51 million kg 125,300 kg 15.38 million kg China
1990s 17.29 million kg 140,514 kg 17.15 million kg China
2000s 12.78 million kg 191,981 kg 12.59 million kg China
2010s 5.53 million kg 821,970 kg 4.70 million kg China
2020s 2.61 million kg 1.81 million kg 807,280 kg China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure management, China or Middle Africa?
China, at 2.07 million kg against 2.06 million kg in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure management between China and Middle Africa?
10,600 kg, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Middle Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Middle Africa rank globally for mules and asses — manure management?
China ranks 5th and Middle Africa ranks 3rd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china/middle-africa/">China vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).