China vs Sudan: Mules and Asses — Manure management

China
2.07 million kg
in 2023
Sudan
3.35 million kg
in 2023
China rank
5th
Sudan rank
3rd

Mules and Asses — Manure management over time

  • China
  • Sudan
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 3.35 million kg against 2.07 million kg in China, a difference of 1.28 million kg.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.6 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was China ahead.

China ranks 5th and Sudan ranks 3rd of 125 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 5.06 million kg 3.31 million kg 1.75 million kg China
2020s 2.61 million kg 3.34 million kg 726,372 kg Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure management, China or Sudan?
Sudan, at 3.35 million kg against 2.07 million kg in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure management between China and Sudan?
1.28 million kg, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do China and Sudan rank globally for mules and asses — manure management?
China ranks 5th and Sudan ranks 3rd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sudan: Mules and Asses — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china/sudan/">China vs Sudan: Mules and Asses — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).