Cuba vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Mules and Asses — Manure management

Cuba
8,413 kg
in 2023
Eswatini, Kingdom of
7,266 kg
in 2023
Cuba rank
63rd
Eswatini, Kingdom of rank
65th

Mules and Asses — Manure management over time

  • Cuba
  • Eswatini, Kingdom of
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 8,413 kg against 7,266 kg in Eswatini, Kingdom of, a difference of 1,147 kg.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini, Kingdom of's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 63rd and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 65th of 125 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Eswatini, Kingdom of Difference Ahead
1960s 7,475 kg 7,108 kg 366.45 kg Cuba
1970s 6,976 kg 6,533 kg 443 kg Cuba
1980s 6,991 kg 5,847 kg 1,145 kg Cuba
1990s 7,810 kg 6,055 kg 1,755 kg Cuba
2000s 6,679 kg 6,527 kg 152.35 kg Cuba
2010s 7,914 kg 7,031 kg 883.03 kg Cuba
2020s 8,717 kg 7,239 kg 1,478 kg Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure management, Cuba or Eswatini, Kingdom of?
Cuba, at 8,413 kg against 7,266 kg in Eswatini, Kingdom of as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure management between Cuba and Eswatini, Kingdom of?
1,147 kg, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini, Kingdom of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Eswatini, Kingdom of rank globally for mules and asses — manure management?
Cuba ranks 63rd and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 65th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Mules and Asses — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/cuba/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/cuba/eswatini/">Cuba vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Mules and Asses — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).