Middle Africa vs Pakistan: Mules and Asses — Manure management

Middle Africa
2.06 million kg
in 2023
Pakistan
6.59 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
3rd
Pakistan rank
1st

Mules and Asses — Manure management over time

  • Middle Africa
  • Pakistan
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 6.59 million kg against 2.06 million kg in Middle Africa, a difference of 4.53 million kg.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 3.2 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 3rd and Pakistan ranks 1st of 13 regions.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 173,754 kg 1.37 million kg 1.19 million kg Pakistan
1970s 161,279 kg 2.30 million kg 2.14 million kg Pakistan
1980s 125,300 kg 3.12 million kg 2.99 million kg Pakistan
1990s 140,514 kg 4.14 million kg 4.00 million kg Pakistan
2000s 191,981 kg 4.75 million kg 4.56 million kg Pakistan
2010s 821,970 kg 5.65 million kg 4.83 million kg Pakistan
2020s 1.81 million kg 6.41 million kg 4.61 million kg Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure management, Middle Africa or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 6.59 million kg against 2.06 million kg in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure management between Middle Africa and Pakistan?
4.53 million kg, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and Pakistan rank globally for mules and asses — manure management?
Middle Africa ranks 3rd and Pakistan ranks 1st of 13 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs Pakistan: Mules and Asses — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/middle-africa/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/middle-africa/pakistan/">Middle Africa vs Pakistan: Mules and Asses — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).