Afghanistan vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Stocks

Afghanistan
1.54 million An
in 2023
Middle Africa
4.72 million An
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
13th
Middle Africa rank
3rd

Mules and Asses — Stocks over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Middle Africa
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 4.72 million An against 1.54 million An in Afghanistan, a difference of 3.18 million An.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 3.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 13th and Middle Africa ranks 3rd of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 5 and Middle Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1.20 million An 398,025 An 802,366 An Afghanistan
1970s 1.31 million An 369,449 An 940,251 An Afghanistan
1980s 1.26 million An 287,030 An 972,770 An Afghanistan
1990s 699,394 An 321,882 An 377,512 An Afghanistan
2000s 1.30 million An 439,779 An 863,321 An Afghanistan
2010s 1.44 million An 1.88 million An 440,134 An Middle Africa
2020s 1.53 million An 4.14 million An 2.60 million An Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Afghanistan or Middle Africa?
Middle Africa, at 4.72 million An against 1.54 million An in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Afghanistan and Middle Africa?
3.18 million An, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Middle Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Middle Africa rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
Afghanistan ranks 13th and Middle Africa ranks 3rd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/afghanistan/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/afghanistan/middle-africa/">Afghanistan vs Middle Africa: Mules and Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).