Australia and New Zealand vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Stocks

Australia and New Zealand
1,869 An
in 2023
Zambia
2,246 An
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
102nd
Zambia rank
100th

Mules and Asses — Stocks over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Zambia
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 2,246 An against 1,869 An in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 377 An.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 102nd and Zambia ranks 100th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 5,000 An 1,000 An 4,000 An Australia and New Zealand
1970s 4,980 An 1,000 An 3,980 An Australia and New Zealand
1980s 3,698 An 1,165 An 2,533 An Australia and New Zealand
1990s 2,276 An 1,690 An 586.4 An Australia and New Zealand
2000s 2,000 An 1,840 An 160 An Australia and New Zealand
2010s 1,950 An 2,094 An 144.2 An Zambia
2020s 1,876 An 2,218 An 341.5 An Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Australia and New Zealand or Zambia?
Zambia, at 2,246 An against 1,869 An in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Australia and New Zealand and Zambia?
377 An, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Zambia rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 102nd and Zambia ranks 100th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/zambia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).