Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Mules and Asses — Stocks

Australia
1,869 An
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand
1,869 An
in 2023
Australia rank
102nd
Australia and New Zealand rank
102nd

Mules and Asses — Stocks over time

  • Australia
  • Australia and New Zealand
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1,869 An against 1,869 An in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0 An.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 102nd and Australia and New Zealand ranks 102nd of 125 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 5,000 An 5,000 An 0 An
1970s 4,980 An 4,980 An 0 An
1980s 3,698 An 3,698 An 0 An
1990s 2,276 An 2,276 An 0 An
2000s 2,000 An 2,000 An 0 An
2010s 1,950 An 1,950 An 0 An
2020s 1,876 An 1,876 An 0 An

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia, at 1,869 An against 1,869 An in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
0 An, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
Australia ranks 102nd and Australia and New Zealand ranks 102nd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Mules and Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).