Canada vs Croatia: Mules and Asses — Stocks
Mules and Asses — Stocks over time
- Canada
- Croatia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 4,000 An against 3,252 An in Croatia, a difference of 748 An.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Canada ranks 103rd and Croatia ranks 105th of 133 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Croatia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,000 An | 6,564 An | 2,564 An | Croatia |
| 2000s | 4,000 An | 3,609 An | 391.2 An | Canada |
| 2010s | 4,000 An | 2,762 An | 1,238 An | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Canada or Croatia?
- Canada, at 4,000 An against 3,252 An in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Canada and Croatia?
- 748 An, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Croatia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Canada and Croatia rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
- Canada ranks 103rd and Croatia ranks 105th of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).