Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Stocks

Central Asia
274,943 An
in 2023
Zimbabwe
669,738 An
in 2023
Central Asia rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
24th

Mules and Asses — Stocks over time

  • Central Asia
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 669,738 An against 274,943 An in Central Asia, a difference of 394,795 An.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.4 times Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central Asia ahead.

Central Asia ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 37 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 383,255 An 120,500 An 262,755 An Central Asia
2000s 538,303 An 403,914 An 134,390 An Central Asia
2010s 564,509 An 560,574 An 3,935 An Central Asia
2020s 315,292 An 619,300 An 304,008 An Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Central Asia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 669,738 An against 274,943 An in Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
394,795 An, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Central Asia and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
Central Asia ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/central-asia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/central-asia/zimbabwe/">Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).