Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Mules and Asses — Stocks

Costa Rica
12,271 An
in 2023
Eswatini
16,645 An
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
74th
Eswatini rank
71st

Mules and Asses — Stocks over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Eswatini
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 16,645 An against 12,271 An in Costa Rica, a difference of 4,374 An.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 74th and Eswatini ranks 71st of 125 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 10,931 An 16,283 An 5,352 An Eswatini
1970s 11,150 An 14,965 An 3,816 An Eswatini
1980s 11,690 An 13,393 An 1,703 An Eswatini
1990s 12,390 An 13,871 An 1,481 An Eswatini
2000s 12,730 An 14,951 An 2,221 An Eswatini
2010s 12,048 An 16,107 An 4,059 An Eswatini
2020s 12,251 An 16,582 An 4,330 An Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Costa Rica or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 16,645 An against 12,271 An in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Costa Rica and Eswatini?
4,374 An, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Eswatini rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
Costa Rica ranks 74th and Eswatini ranks 71st of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/costa-rica/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/costa-rica/eswatini/">Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Mules and Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).