Costa Rica vs Georgia: Mules and Asses — Stocks
Mules and Asses — Stocks over time
- Costa Rica
- Georgia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 12,271 An against 9,794 An in Georgia, a difference of 2,477 An.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 74th and Georgia ranks 77th of 125 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,475 An | 7,605 An | 4,870 An | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 12,730 An | 10,283 An | 2,447 An | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 12,048 An | 10,103 An | 1,945 An | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 12,251 An | 9,839 An | 2,412 An | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Costa Rica or Georgia?
- Costa Rica, at 12,271 An against 9,794 An in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Costa Rica and Georgia?
- 2,477 An, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Georgia rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
- Costa Rica ranks 74th and Georgia ranks 77th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).