Croatia vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Stocks
Mules and Asses — Stocks over time
- Croatia
- Zambia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 3,252 An against 2,246 An in Zambia, a difference of 1,006 An.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 105th and Zambia ranks 108th of 133 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,564 An | 1,700 An | 4,864 An | Croatia |
| 2000s | 3,609 An | 1,840 An | 1,769 An | Croatia |
| 2010s | 2,762 An | 2,077 An | 684.75 An | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Croatia or Zambia?
- Croatia, at 3,252 An against 2,246 An in Zambia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Croatia and Zambia?
- 1,006 An, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Croatia and Zambia rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
- Croatia ranks 105th and Zambia ranks 108th of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).