Georgia vs Portugal: Mules and Asses — Stocks
Mules and Asses — Stocks over time
- Georgia
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 12,000 An against 9,794 An in Georgia, a difference of 2,206 An.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 84th and Portugal ranks 82nd of 133 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,605 An | 62,765 An | 55,160 An | Portugal |
| 2000s | 10,283 An | 34,066 An | 23,784 An | Portugal |
| 2010s | 10,102 An | 15,188 An | 5,086 An | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Georgia or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 12,000 An against 9,794 An in Georgia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Georgia and Portugal?
- 2,206 An, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Portugal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Georgia and Portugal rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
- Georgia ranks 84th and Portugal ranks 82nd of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).