Italy vs Kazakhstan: Mules and Asses — Stocks
Mules and Asses — Stocks over time
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 29,559 An against 27,972 An in Italy, a difference of 1,587 An.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 67th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 133 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44,062 An | 37,875 An | 6,187 An | Italy |
| 2000s | 32,590 An | 30,100 An | 2,490 An | Italy |
| 2010s | 31,802 An | 29,678 An | 2,124 An | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Italy or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 29,559 An against 27,972 An in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Italy and Kazakhstan?
- 1,587 An, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Kazakhstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Italy and Kazakhstan rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
- Italy ranks 67th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).