Southern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Stocks

Southern Africa
554,592 An
in 2023
Zimbabwe
669,738 An
in 2023
Southern Africa rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
21st

Mules and Asses — Stocks over time

  • Southern Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 669,738 An against 554,592 An in Southern Africa, a difference of 115,146 An.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Southern Africa ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 32 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Southern Africa averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Southern Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 500,026 An 79,167 An 420,860 An Southern Africa
1970s 495,130 An 91,400 An 403,730 An Southern Africa
1980s 576,247 An 98,900 An 477,347 An Southern Africa
1990s 769,179 An 117,300 An 651,879 An Southern Africa
2000s 814,703 An 403,914 An 410,790 An Southern Africa
2010s 686,385 An 560,574 An 125,811 An Southern Africa
2020s 561,795 An 619,300 An 57,505 An Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Southern Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 669,738 An against 554,592 An in Southern Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Southern Africa and Zimbabwe?
115,146 An, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Southern Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
Southern Africa ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Southern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/southern-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/southern-africa/zimbabwe/">Southern Africa vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).