Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Stocks

Syrian Arab Republic
54,985 An
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
192,025 An
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Mules and Asses — Stocks over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 192,025 An against 54,985 An in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 137,040 An.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.5 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 13 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 4 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 276,472 An 154,000 An 122,472 An Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 290,136 An 160,200 An 129,936 An Syrian Arab Republic
1980s 237,828 An 168,400 An 69,428 An Syrian Arab Republic
1990s 210,088 An 176,800 An 33,288 An Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 135,267 An 181,800 An 46,533 An United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 86,154 An 186,743 An 100,589 An United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 58,343 An 191,219 An 132,876 An United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — stocks, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 192,025 An against 54,985 An in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — stocks between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
137,040 An, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for mules and asses — stocks?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-stocks/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mules and Asses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).