Botswana vs Uruguay: Mules and hinnies — Amount excreted in manure

Botswana
73,033 kg
in 2023
Uruguay
89,884 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
42nd
Uruguay rank
40th

Mules and hinnies — Amount excreted in manure over time

  • Botswana
  • Uruguay
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 89,884 kg against 73,033 kg in Botswana, a difference of 16,851 kg.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Botswana ranks 42nd and Uruguay ranks 40th of 81 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 14,850 kg 76,394 kg 61,545 kg Uruguay
1970s 41,268 kg 75,958 kg 34,690 kg Uruguay
1980s 66,027 kg 76,831 kg 10,804 kg Uruguay
1990s 54,568 kg 80,105 kg 25,538 kg Uruguay
2000s 57,187 kg 83,379 kg 26,192 kg Uruguay
2010s 69,774 kg 87,873 kg 18,099 kg Uruguay
2020s 72,564 kg 89,578 kg 17,014 kg Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — amount excreted in manure, Botswana or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 89,884 kg against 73,033 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — amount excreted in manure between Botswana and Uruguay?
16,851 kg, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Uruguay rank globally for mules and hinnies — amount excreted in manure?
Botswana ranks 42nd and Uruguay ranks 40th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Amount excreted in manure (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Uruguay: Mules and hinnies — Amount excreted in manure. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/botswana/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/botswana/uruguay/">Botswana vs Uruguay: Mules and hinnies — Amount excreted in manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Amount excreted in manure (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).