Barbados vs Lesotho: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Barbados
436.54 kg
in 2023
Lesotho
496.35 kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
56th
Lesotho rank
53rd

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Barbados
  • Lesotho
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 496.35 kg against 436.54 kg in Barbados, a difference of 59.81 kg.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Barbados ranks 56th and Lesotho ranks 53rd of 81 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 436.54 kg 1,569 kg 1,132 kg Lesotho
1970s 436.54 kg 921.1 kg 484.56 kg Lesotho
1980s 436.54 kg 436.54 kg 0 kg
1990s 436.54 kg 432.17 kg 4.37 kg Barbados
2000s 436.54 kg 593.26 kg 156.72 kg Lesotho
2010s 436.54 kg 755.13 kg 318.59 kg Lesotho
2020s 436.54 kg 513.59 kg 77.05 kg Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Barbados or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 496.35 kg against 436.54 kg in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Barbados and Lesotho?
59.81 kg, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Lesotho rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Barbados ranks 56th and Lesotho ranks 53rd of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Lesotho: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/barbados/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/barbados/lesotho/">Barbados vs Lesotho: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).