Botswana vs Chile: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Botswana
1,461 kg
in 2023
Chile
1,448 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
42nd
Chile rank
43rd

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Botswana
  • Chile
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 1,461 kg against 1,448 kg in Chile, a difference of 13 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Botswana ranks 42nd and Chile ranks 43rd of 81 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 296.99 kg 4,778 kg 4,481 kg Chile
1970s 825.37 kg 3,099 kg 2,274 kg Chile
1980s 1,321 kg 2,183 kg 862.17 kg Chile
1990s 1,091 kg 2,161 kg 1,070 kg Chile
2000s 1,144 kg 1,986 kg 841.8 kg Chile
2010s 1,395 kg 1,526 kg 130.46 kg Chile
2020s 1,451 kg 1,464 kg 12.28 kg Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Botswana or Chile?
Botswana, at 1,461 kg against 1,448 kg in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Botswana and Chile?
13 kg, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Chile rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Botswana ranks 42nd and Chile ranks 43rd of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Chile: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/botswana/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/botswana/chile/">Botswana vs Chile: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).