Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Botswana
1,461 kg
in 2023
Portugal
1,727 kg
in 2017
Botswana rank
42nd
Portugal rank
39th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Botswana
  • Portugal
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 1,727 kg against 1,461 kg in Botswana, a difference of 266 kg.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 42nd and Portugal ranks 39th of 81 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 296.99 kg 50,326 kg 50,029 kg Portugal
1970s 825.37 kg 43,785 kg 42,960 kg Portugal
1980s 1,321 kg 42,760 kg 41,440 kg Portugal
1990s 1,091 kg 9,652 kg 8,561 kg Portugal
2000s 1,144 kg 5,288 kg 4,144 kg Portugal
2010s 1,387 kg 2,343 kg 955.95 kg Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Botswana or Portugal?
Portugal, at 1,727 kg against 1,461 kg in Botswana as of 2017.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Botswana and Portugal?
266 kg, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Portugal?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Portugal rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Botswana ranks 42nd and Portugal ranks 39th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/botswana/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/botswana/portugal/">Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).