Brazil vs Ethiopia PDR: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Brazil
266,232 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR
275,020 kg
in 1992
Brazil rank
6th
Ethiopia PDR rank
5th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Brazil
  • Ethiopia PDR
200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia PDR currently reports 275,020 kg against 266,232 kg in Brazil, a difference of 8,788 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.

Brazil ranks 6th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 5th of 81 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia PDR in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Ethiopia PDR Difference Ahead
1960s 340,356 kg 585,652 kg 245,297 kg Ethiopia PDR
1970s 358,581 kg 620,398 kg 261,816 kg Ethiopia PDR
1980s 409,819 kg 205,610 kg 204,209 kg Brazil
1990s 444,858 kg 266,289 kg 178,569 kg Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Brazil or Ethiopia PDR?
Ethiopia PDR, at 275,020 kg against 266,232 kg in Brazil as of 1992.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Brazil and Ethiopia PDR?
8,788 kg, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ethiopia PDR?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Brazil and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Brazil ranks 6th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 5th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Ethiopia PDR: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/brazil/ethiopia-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/brazil/ethiopia-pdr/">Brazil vs Ethiopia PDR: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).