Central Asia vs Ecuador: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Central Asia
545.67 kg
in 2023
Ecuador
11,801 kg
in 2023
Central Asia rank
26th
Ecuador rank
21st

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Central Asia
  • Ecuador
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 11,801 kg against 545.67 kg in Central Asia, a difference of 11,255 kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 21.6 times Central Asia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Central Asia ranks 26th and Ecuador ranks 21st of 31 groups.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 551.13 kg 33,532 kg 32,981 kg Ecuador
2000s 542.73 kg 28,319 kg 27,776 kg Ecuador
2010s 545.67 kg 21,488 kg 20,943 kg Ecuador
2020s 545.67 kg 13,419 kg 12,873 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Central Asia or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 11,801 kg against 545.67 kg in Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Central Asia and Ecuador?
11,255 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Ecuador?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Central Asia and Ecuador rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Central Asia ranks 26th and Ecuador ranks 21st of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Ecuador: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/central-asia/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/central-asia/ecuador/">Central Asia vs Ecuador: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).