Cuba vs El Salvador: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Cuba
4,584 kg
in 2023
El Salvador
5,217 kg
in 2023
Cuba rank
31st
El Salvador rank
29th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Cuba
  • El Salvador
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 5,217 kg against 4,584 kg in Cuba, a difference of 633 kg.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Cuba ranks 31st and El Salvador ranks 29th of 81 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and El Salvador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 6,565 kg 5,675 kg 890.06 kg Cuba
1970s 6,040 kg 4,810 kg 1,230 kg Cuba
1980s 6,125 kg 4,944 kg 1,181 kg Cuba
1990s 6,526 kg 5,147 kg 1,379 kg Cuba
2000s 4,793 kg 5,243 kg 449.64 kg El Salvador
2010s 4,586 kg 5,237 kg 651.1 kg El Salvador
2020s 4,797 kg 5,221 kg 424.26 kg El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Cuba or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 5,217 kg against 4,584 kg in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Cuba and El Salvador?
633 kg, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and El Salvador rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Cuba ranks 31st and El Salvador ranks 29th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs El Salvador: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cuba/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cuba/el-salvador/">Cuba vs El Salvador: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).