Ecuador vs Southern Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Ecuador
11,801 kg
in 2023
Southern Africa
11,989 kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
21st
Southern Africa rank
19th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ecuador
  • Southern Africa
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k35.0k196119922023

How they compare

Southern Africa currently reports 11,989 kg against 11,801 kg in Ecuador, a difference of 188 kg.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Ecuador ranks 21st and Southern Africa ranks 19th of 81 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 21,617 kg 19,616 kg 2,001 kg Ecuador
1970s 19,796 kg 10,761 kg 9,035 kg Ecuador
1980s 23,451 kg 10,410 kg 13,041 kg Ecuador
1990s 32,773 kg 10,508 kg 22,265 kg Ecuador
2000s 28,319 kg 10,824 kg 17,495 kg Ecuador
2010s 21,488 kg 11,672 kg 9,817 kg Ecuador
2020s 13,419 kg 11,909 kg 1,509 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Ecuador or Southern Africa?
Southern Africa, at 11,989 kg against 11,801 kg in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Ecuador and Southern Africa?
188 kg, with Southern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Southern Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Southern Africa rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Ecuador ranks 21st and Southern Africa ranks 19th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Southern Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ecuador/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ecuador/southern-africa/">Ecuador vs Southern Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).