Eswatini vs Guadeloupe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Eswatini
48.02 kg
in 2023
Guadeloupe
21.83 kg
in 2006
Eswatini rank
66th
Guadeloupe rank
68th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guadeloupe
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 48.02 kg against 21.83 kg in Guadeloupe, a difference of 26.19 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.2 times Guadeloupe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 66th and Guadeloupe ranks 68th of 81 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guadeloupe Difference Ahead
1960s 232.38 kg 75.96 kg 156.43 kg Eswatini
1970s 134.98 kg 27.28 kg 107.69 kg Eswatini
1980s 118.65 kg 21.83 kg 96.82 kg Eswatini
1990s 34.49 kg 21.83 kg 12.66 kg Eswatini
2000s 39.29 kg 21.83 kg 17.46 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Eswatini or Guadeloupe?
Eswatini, at 48.02 kg against 21.83 kg in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Eswatini and Guadeloupe?
26.19 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guadeloupe?
46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
How do Eswatini and Guadeloupe rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Eswatini ranks 66th and Guadeloupe ranks 68th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guadeloupe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/guadeloupe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/guadeloupe/">Eswatini vs Guadeloupe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).