Eswatini vs Malta: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time
- Eswatini
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 145.08 kg against 48.02 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 97.06 kg.
That makes Malta's figure about 3.0 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Eswatini ranks 66th and Malta ranks 64th of 81 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 232.38 kg | 667.18 kg | 434.8 kg | Malta |
| 1970s | 134.98 kg | 370.95 kg | 235.97 kg | Malta |
| 1980s | 118.65 kg | 161.42 kg | 42.77 kg | Malta |
| 1990s | 34.49 kg | 148.04 kg | 113.56 kg | Malta |
| 2000s | 39.73 kg | 148.04 kg | 108.32 kg | Malta |
| 2010s | 46 kg | 144.71 kg | 98.71 kg | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Eswatini or Malta?
- Malta, at 145.08 kg against 48.02 kg in Eswatini as of 2017.
- What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Eswatini and Malta?
- 97.06 kg, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malta?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Eswatini and Malta rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
- Eswatini ranks 66th and Malta ranks 64th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).