Ethiopia PDR vs Pakistan: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Ethiopia PDR
275,020 kg
in 1992
Pakistan
229,184 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
5th
Pakistan rank
7th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • Pakistan
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia PDR currently reports 275,020 kg against 229,184 kg in Pakistan, a difference of 45,836 kg.

That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 5th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 81 countries.

Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 585,652 kg 32,950 kg 552,703 kg Ethiopia PDR
1970s 620,398 kg 63,298 kg 557,099 kg Ethiopia PDR
1980s 205,610 kg 71,920 kg 133,690 kg Ethiopia PDR
1990s 266,289 kg 80,396 kg 185,893 kg Ethiopia PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Ethiopia PDR or Pakistan?
Ethiopia PDR, at 275,020 kg against 229,184 kg in Pakistan as of 1992.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan?
45,836 kg, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 5th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs Pakistan: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia-pdr/pakistan/">Ethiopia PDR vs Pakistan: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).