Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Lesotho
496.35 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
545.24 kg
in 2023
Lesotho rank
53rd
Zimbabwe rank
52nd

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Lesotho
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 545.24 kg against 496.35 kg in Lesotho, a difference of 48.89 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 81 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1,569 kg 436.54 kg 1,132 kg Lesotho
1970s 921.1 kg 436.54 kg 484.56 kg Lesotho
1980s 436.54 kg 436.54 kg 0 kg
1990s 432.17 kg 436.54 kg 4.37 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 593.26 kg 529.74 kg 63.52 kg Lesotho
2010s 755.13 kg 536.11 kg 219.01 kg Lesotho
2020s 513.59 kg 544.8 kg 31.21 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 545.24 kg against 496.35 kg in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
48.89 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Lesotho ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/lesotho/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/lesotho/zimbabwe/">Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).