Malta vs Russian Federation: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils

Malta
145.08 kg
in 2017
Russian Federation
181.07 kg
in 2023
Malta rank
64th
Russian Federation rank
63rd

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Malta
  • Russian Federation
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 181.07 kg against 145.08 kg in Malta, a difference of 35.99 kg.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 64th and Russian Federation ranks 63rd of 81 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 148.04 kg 111.74 kg 36.3 kg Malta
2000s 148.04 kg 206.81 kg 58.76 kg Russian Federation
2010s 144.71 kg 209.54 kg 64.83 kg Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils, Malta or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 181.07 kg against 145.08 kg in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils between Malta and Russian Federation?
35.99 kg, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Malta and Russian Federation rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils?
Malta ranks 64th and Russian Federation ranks 63rd of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Russian Federation: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/malta/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/malta/russian-federation-2/">Malta vs Russian Federation: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).