Eswatini vs Russian Federation: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Eswatini
14.41 kg
in 2023
Russian Federation
54.32 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
66th
Russian Federation rank
63rd

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Eswatini
  • Russian Federation
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 54.32 kg against 14.41 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 39.91 kg.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 3.8 times Eswatini's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 66th and Russian Federation ranks 63rd of 81 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 10.15 kg 33.52 kg 23.37 kg Russian Federation
2000s 11.92 kg 62.04 kg 50.12 kg Russian Federation
2010s 13.88 kg 61.22 kg 47.34 kg Russian Federation
2020s 14.27 kg 51.84 kg 37.57 kg Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that leaches, Eswatini or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 54.32 kg against 14.41 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that leaches between Eswatini and Russian Federation?
39.91 kg, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Russian Federation rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Eswatini ranks 66th and Russian Federation ranks 63rd of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Russian Federation: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/eswatini/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/eswatini/russian-federation-2/">Eswatini vs Russian Federation: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).