Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Puerto Rico
170.51 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
163.57 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
50th
Zimbabwe rank
52nd

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Zimbabwe
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 170.51 kg against 163.57 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.94 kg.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 81 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 165.16 kg 130.96 kg 34.2 kg Puerto Rico
1970s 142.42 kg 130.96 kg 11.46 kg Puerto Rico
1980s 156.17 kg 130.96 kg 25.21 kg Puerto Rico
1990s 163.7 kg 130.96 kg 32.74 kg Puerto Rico
2000s 165.01 kg 158.92 kg 6.09 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 170.45 kg 160.83 kg 9.62 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 170.53 kg 163.44 kg 7.09 kg Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that leaches, Puerto Rico or Zimbabwe?
Puerto Rico, at 170.51 kg against 163.57 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that leaches between Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
6.94 kg, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Puerto Rico ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/">Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).