Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Botswana
292.13 kg
in 2023
Portugal
345.44 kg
in 2017
Botswana rank
42nd
Portugal rank
39th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Portugal
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 345.44 kg against 292.13 kg in Botswana, a difference of 53.31 kg.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 42nd and Portugal ranks 39th of 81 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 59.4 kg 10,065 kg 10,006 kg Portugal
1970s 165.07 kg 8,757 kg 8,592 kg Portugal
1980s 264.11 kg 8,552 kg 8,288 kg Portugal
1990s 218.27 kg 1,930 kg 1,712 kg Portugal
2000s 228.75 kg 1,058 kg 828.83 kg Portugal
2010s 277.35 kg 468.53 kg 191.19 kg Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Botswana or Portugal?
Portugal, at 345.44 kg against 292.13 kg in Botswana as of 2017.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Botswana and Portugal?
53.31 kg, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Portugal?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Portugal rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 42nd and Portugal ranks 39th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/portugal/">Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).