Brazil vs Ethiopia: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Brazil
53,246 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia
34,146 kg
in 2023
Brazil rank
6th
Ethiopia rank
8th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Brazil
  • Ethiopia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 53,246 kg against 34,146 kg in Ethiopia, a difference of 19,100 kg.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.6 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 6th and Ethiopia ranks 8th of 81 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 69,713 kg 30,684 kg 39,029 kg Brazil
2000s 58,687 kg 27,016 kg 31,671 kg Brazil
2010s 54,373 kg 33,755 kg 20,617 kg Brazil
2020s 53,385 kg 32,462 kg 20,923 kg Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Brazil or Ethiopia?
Brazil, at 53,246 kg against 34,146 kg in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Brazil and Ethiopia?
19,100 kg, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ethiopia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Ethiopia rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Brazil ranks 6th and Ethiopia ranks 8th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Ethiopia: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/brazil/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/brazil/ethiopia/">Brazil vs Ethiopia: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).