Ecuador vs Southern Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Ecuador
2,360 kg
in 2023
Southern Africa
2,398 kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
21st
Southern Africa rank
19th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Ecuador
  • Southern Africa
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k7.0k196119922023

How they compare

Southern Africa currently reports 2,398 kg against 2,360 kg in Ecuador, a difference of 38 kg.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Ecuador ranks 21st and Southern Africa ranks 19th of 81 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 4,323 kg 3,923 kg 400.22 kg Ecuador
1970s 3,959 kg 2,152 kg 1,807 kg Ecuador
1980s 4,690 kg 2,082 kg 2,608 kg Ecuador
1990s 6,555 kg 2,102 kg 4,453 kg Ecuador
2000s 5,664 kg 2,165 kg 3,499 kg Ecuador
2010s 4,298 kg 2,334 kg 1,963 kg Ecuador
2020s 2,684 kg 2,382 kg 301.84 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Ecuador or Southern Africa?
Southern Africa, at 2,398 kg against 2,360 kg in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Ecuador and Southern Africa?
38 kg, with Southern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Southern Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Southern Africa rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Ecuador ranks 21st and Southern Africa ranks 19th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Southern Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/ecuador/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/ecuador/southern-africa/">Ecuador vs Southern Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).