Lesotho vs Panama: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Lesotho
99.27 kg
in 2023
Panama
92.5 kg
in 2023
Lesotho rank
53rd
Panama rank
54th

Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Lesotho
  • Panama
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 99.27 kg against 92.5 kg in Panama, a difference of 6.77 kg.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 54th of 81 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 4 and Panama in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 313.79 kg 180.56 kg 133.24 kg Lesotho
1970s 184.22 kg 133.73 kg 50.49 kg Lesotho
1980s 87.31 kg 137.96 kg 50.65 kg Panama
1990s 86.43 kg 168.42 kg 81.98 kg Panama
2000s 118.65 kg 171.8 kg 53.14 kg Panama
2010s 151.03 kg 105.61 kg 45.42 kg Lesotho
2020s 102.72 kg 95.01 kg 7.71 kg Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Lesotho or Panama?
Lesotho, at 99.27 kg against 92.5 kg in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Lesotho and Panama?
6.77 kg, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Panama rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Lesotho ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 54th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Panama: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/lesotho/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/lesotho/panama/">Lesotho vs Panama: Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).