Belgium-Luxembourg vs Eswatini: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture

Belgium-Luxembourg
5,922 kg
in 1985
Eswatini
2,377 kg
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
66th
Eswatini rank
69th

Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Eswatini
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 5,922 kg against 2,377 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 3,545 kg.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 2.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 66th and Eswatini ranks 69th of 81 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 11,471 kg 11,503 kg 31.93 kg Eswatini
1970s 7,769 kg 6,681 kg 1,088 kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1980s 5,989 kg 7,412 kg 1,423 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture, Belgium-Luxembourg or Eswatini?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 5,922 kg against 2,377 kg in Eswatini as of 1985.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture between Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini?
3,545 kg, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini?
25 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1985.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 66th and Eswatini ranks 69th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Eswatini: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/eswatini/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Eswatini: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).