Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture

Botswana
72,303 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico
56,269 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
42nd
Puerto Rico rank
45th

Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture over time

  • Botswana
  • Puerto Rico
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 72,303 kg against 56,269 kg in Puerto Rico, a difference of 16,034 kg.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Botswana ranks 42nd and Puerto Rico ranks 45th of 81 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Puerto Rico in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 14,701 kg 54,502 kg 39,801 kg Puerto Rico
1970s 40,856 kg 46,999 kg 6,143 kg Puerto Rico
1980s 65,366 kg 51,537 kg 13,830 kg Botswana
1990s 54,022 kg 54,022 kg 0 kg
2000s 56,615 kg 54,454 kg 2,161 kg Botswana
2010s 69,077 kg 56,250 kg 12,827 kg Botswana
2020s 71,838 kg 56,274 kg 15,564 kg Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture, Botswana or Puerto Rico?
Botswana, at 72,303 kg against 56,269 kg in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture between Botswana and Puerto Rico?
16,034 kg, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Puerto Rico rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture?
Botswana ranks 42nd and Puerto Rico ranks 45th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/botswana/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/botswana/puerto-rico-us/">Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).