Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture

Lesotho
24,569 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
26,989 kg
in 2023
Lesotho rank
55th
Zimbabwe rank
54th

Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture over time

  • Lesotho
  • Zimbabwe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 26,989 kg against 24,569 kg in Lesotho, a difference of 2,420 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 81 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 77,664 kg 21,609 kg 56,055 kg Lesotho
1970s 45,594 kg 21,609 kg 23,986 kg Lesotho
1980s 21,609 kg 21,609 kg 0 kg
1990s 21,393 kg 21,609 kg 216.07 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 29,366 kg 26,222 kg 3,144 kg Lesotho
2010s 37,379 kg 26,538 kg 10,841 kg Lesotho
2020s 25,423 kg 26,968 kg 1,545 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 26,989 kg against 24,569 kg in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
2,420 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture?
Lesotho ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/lesotho/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/lesotho/zimbabwe/">Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).