Belgium-Luxembourg vs Eswatini: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Belgium-Luxembourg
1,184 kg
in 1985
Eswatini
475.39 kg
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
66th
Eswatini rank
69th

Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Eswatini
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 1,184 kg against 475.39 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 708.61 kg.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 2.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 66th and Eswatini ranks 69th of 81 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 2,294 kg 2,301 kg 6.39 kg Eswatini
1970s 1,554 kg 1,336 kg 217.59 kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1980s 1,198 kg 1,482 kg 284.58 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Belgium-Luxembourg or Eswatini?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 1,184 kg against 475.39 kg in Eswatini as of 1985.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini?
708.61 kg, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini?
25 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1985.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Eswatini rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 66th and Eswatini ranks 69th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Eswatini: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/eswatini/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Eswatini: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).