Botswana vs Italy: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Botswana
14,461 kg
in 2023
Italy
16,536 kg
in 2017
Botswana rank
42nd
Italy rank
41st

Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Italy
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 16,536 kg against 14,461 kg in Botswana, a difference of 2,075 kg.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 42nd and Italy ranks 41st of 81 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Italy Difference Ahead
1960s 2,940 kg 643,874 kg 640,934 kg Italy
1970s 8,171 kg 326,950 kg 318,779 kg Italy
1980s 13,073 kg 151,846 kg 138,773 kg Italy
1990s 10,804 kg 44,895 kg 34,091 kg Italy
2000s 11,323 kg 22,242 kg 10,919 kg Italy
2010s 13,729 kg 20,128 kg 6,399 kg Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Botswana or Italy?
Italy, at 16,536 kg against 14,461 kg in Botswana as of 2017.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Botswana and Italy?
2,075 kg, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Italy?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Italy rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 42nd and Italy ranks 41st of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Italy: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/italy/">Botswana vs Italy: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).