Botswana vs Uruguay: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Botswana
14,461 kg
in 2023
Uruguay
17,797 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
42nd
Uruguay rank
40th

Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Uruguay
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 17,797 kg against 14,461 kg in Botswana, a difference of 3,336 kg.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Botswana ranks 42nd and Uruguay ranks 40th of 81 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 2,940 kg 15,126 kg 12,186 kg Uruguay
1970s 8,171 kg 15,040 kg 6,869 kg Uruguay
1980s 13,073 kg 15,213 kg 2,139 kg Uruguay
1990s 10,804 kg 15,861 kg 5,056 kg Uruguay
2000s 11,323 kg 16,509 kg 5,186 kg Uruguay
2010s 13,815 kg 17,399 kg 3,584 kg Uruguay
2020s 14,368 kg 17,736 kg 3,369 kg Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Botswana or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 17,797 kg against 14,461 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Botswana and Uruguay?
3,336 kg, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Uruguay rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 42nd and Uruguay ranks 40th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Uruguay: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/uruguay/">Botswana vs Uruguay: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).