Eswatini vs Malta: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Eswatini
475.39 kg
in 2023
Malta
696.4 kg
in 2017
Eswatini rank
69th
Malta rank
67th

Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Eswatini
  • Malta
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 696.4 kg against 475.39 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 221.01 kg.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Eswatini ranks 69th and Malta ranks 67th of 81 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 2,301 kg 3,202 kg 901.88 kg Malta
1970s 1,336 kg 1,781 kg 444.27 kg Malta
1980s 1,175 kg 774.8 kg 399.85 kg Eswatini
1990s 341.42 kg 710.61 kg 369.19 kg Malta
2000s 393.28 kg 710.61 kg 317.33 kg Malta
2010s 455.4 kg 694.62 kg 239.22 kg Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Eswatini or Malta?
Malta, at 696.4 kg against 475.39 kg in Eswatini as of 2017.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Eswatini and Malta?
221.01 kg, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Eswatini and Malta rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Eswatini ranks 69th and Malta ranks 67th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Malta: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/malta/">Eswatini vs Malta: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).