Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Lesotho
4,914 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
5,398 kg
in 2023
Lesotho rank
55th
Zimbabwe rank
54th

Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Lesotho
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 5,398 kg against 4,914 kg in Lesotho, a difference of 484 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 81 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 15,533 kg 4,322 kg 11,211 kg Lesotho
1970s 9,119 kg 4,322 kg 4,797 kg Lesotho
1980s 4,322 kg 4,322 kg 0 kg
1990s 4,279 kg 4,322 kg 43.22 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 5,873 kg 5,244 kg 628.81 kg Lesotho
2010s 7,476 kg 5,308 kg 2,168 kg Lesotho
2020s 5,085 kg 5,394 kg 309.01 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 5,398 kg against 4,914 kg in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
484 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Lesotho ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/lesotho/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/lesotho/zimbabwe/">Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).