Annex I countries vs Ecuador: Mules and hinnies — Manure management

Annex I countries
5,656 kg
in 2023
Ecuador
11,801 kg
in 2023
Annex I countries rank
20th
Ecuador rank
21st

Mules and hinnies — Manure management over time

  • Annex I countries
  • Ecuador
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 11,801 kg against 5,656 kg in Annex I countries, a difference of 6,145 kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 2.1 times Annex I countries's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Annex I countries ahead.

Annex I countries ranks 20th and Ecuador ranks 21st of 31 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Annex I countries averaged higher in 6 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Annex I countries Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 820,539 kg 21,617 kg 798,922 kg Annex I countries
1970s 447,903 kg 19,796 kg 428,108 kg Annex I countries
1980s 270,092 kg 23,451 kg 246,641 kg Annex I countries
1990s 165,288 kg 32,773 kg 132,515 kg Annex I countries
2000s 122,474 kg 28,319 kg 94,156 kg Annex I countries
2010s 74,654 kg 21,488 kg 53,166 kg Annex I countries
2020s 5,651 kg 13,419 kg 7,768 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure management, Annex I countries or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 11,801 kg against 5,656 kg in Annex I countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure management between Annex I countries and Ecuador?
6,145 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Annex I countries and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Annex I countries and Ecuador rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure management?
Annex I countries ranks 20th and Ecuador ranks 21st of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Annex I countries vs Ecuador: Mules and hinnies — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/annex-i-countries/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/annex-i-countries/ecuador/">Annex I countries vs Ecuador: Mules and hinnies — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).