Ecuador vs South Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure management

Ecuador
11,801 kg
in 2023
South Africa
7,017 kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
21st
South Africa rank
26th

Mules and hinnies — Manure management over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
10.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 11,801 kg against 7,017 kg in South Africa, a difference of 4,784 kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.7 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Ecuador ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 26th of 81 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 21,617 kg 15,909 kg 5,708 kg Ecuador
1970s 19,796 kg 6,766 kg 13,029 kg Ecuador
1980s 23,451 kg 6,112 kg 17,339 kg Ecuador
1990s 32,773 kg 6,112 kg 26,661 kg Ecuador
2000s 28,319 kg 6,140 kg 22,179 kg Ecuador
2010s 21,488 kg 6,533 kg 14,955 kg Ecuador
2020s 13,419 kg 6,933 kg 6,486 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — manure management, Ecuador or South Africa?
Ecuador, at 11,801 kg against 7,017 kg in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — manure management between Ecuador and South Africa?
4,784 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for mules and hinnies — manure management?
Ecuador ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 26th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Mules and hinnies — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).