Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Stocks

Botswana
3,346 An
in 2023
Portugal
3,500 An
in 2017
Botswana rank
50th
Portugal rank
49th

Mules and hinnies — Stocks over time

  • Botswana
  • Portugal
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 3,500 An against 3,346 An in Botswana, a difference of 154 An.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 50th and Portugal ranks 49th of 86 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 680.33 An 101,982 An 101,301 An Portugal
1970s 1,891 An 88,727 An 86,836 An Portugal
1980s 3,025 An 86,650 An 83,625 An Portugal
1990s 2,500 An 19,559 An 17,059 An Portugal
2000s 2,620 An 10,716 An 8,096 An Portugal
2010s 3,177 An 4,747 An 1,571 An Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — stocks, Botswana or Portugal?
Portugal, at 3,500 An against 3,346 An in Botswana as of 2017.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — stocks between Botswana and Portugal?
154 An, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Portugal?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Portugal rank globally for mules and hinnies — stocks?
Botswana ranks 50th and Portugal ranks 49th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-stocks-2/botswana/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-stocks-2/botswana/portugal/">Botswana vs Portugal: Mules and hinnies — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).