Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Mules and hinnies — Stocks

Botswana
3,346 An
in 2023
Puerto Rico
2,604 An
in 2023
Botswana rank
46th
Puerto Rico rank
48th

Mules and hinnies — Stocks over time

  • Botswana
  • Puerto Rico
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 3,346 An against 2,604 An in Puerto Rico, a difference of 742 An.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Botswana ranks 46th and Puerto Rico ranks 48th of 81 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Puerto Rico in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 680.33 An 2,522 An 1,842 An Puerto Rico
1970s 1,891 An 2,175 An 284.3 An Puerto Rico
1980s 3,025 An 2,385 An 640 An Botswana
1990s 2,500 An 2,500 An 0 An
2000s 2,620 An 2,520 An 100 An Botswana
2010s 3,197 An 2,603 An 593.6 An Botswana
2020s 3,324 An 2,604 An 720.25 An Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and hinnies — stocks, Botswana or Puerto Rico?
Botswana, at 3,346 An against 2,604 An in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and hinnies — stocks between Botswana and Puerto Rico?
742 An, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Puerto Rico rank globally for mules and hinnies — stocks?
Botswana ranks 46th and Puerto Rico ranks 48th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-stocks-2/botswana/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-hinnies-stocks-2/botswana/puerto-rico-us/">Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Mules and hinnies — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and hinnies — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
121 places, 7,034 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).