Eswatini vs Georgia: Mules and hinnies — Stocks
Mules and hinnies — Stocks over time
- Eswatini
- Georgia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 110 An against 90 An in Georgia, a difference of 20 An.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 77th and Georgia ranks 79th of 86 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.5 An | 186.25 An | 108.75 An | Georgia |
| 2000s | 91 An | 98.1 An | 7.1 An | Georgia |
| 2010s | 106 An | 98.3 An | 7.7 An | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 109 An | 90.25 An | 18.75 An | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and hinnies — stocks, Eswatini or Georgia?
- Eswatini, at 110 An against 90 An in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mules and hinnies — stocks between Eswatini and Georgia?
- 20 An, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Georgia rank globally for mules and hinnies — stocks?
- Eswatini ranks 77th and Georgia ranks 79th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).