Eswatini vs Russian Federation: Mules and hinnies — Stocks
Mules and hinnies — Stocks over time
- Eswatini
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 159 An against 110 An in Eswatini, a difference of 49 An.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.4 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Eswatini ranks 71st and Russian Federation ranks 69th of 81 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.5 An | 98.12 An | 20.62 An | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 91 An | 181.6 An | 90.6 An | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 106 An | 179.2 An | 73.2 An | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 109 An | 151.75 An | 42.75 An | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and hinnies — stocks, Eswatini or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 159 An against 110 An in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mules and hinnies — stocks between Eswatini and Russian Federation?
- 49 An, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Russian Federation rank globally for mules and hinnies — stocks?
- Eswatini ranks 71st and Russian Federation ranks 69th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).