Kyrgyzstan vs Malta: Mules and hinnies — Stocks
Mules and hinnies — Stocks over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Malta
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 500 An against 294 An in Malta, a difference of 206 An.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.7 times Malta's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 65th and Malta ranks 67th of 81 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 505 An | 300 An | 205 An | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 497.3 An | 300 An | 197.3 An | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 500 An | 293.25 An | 206.75 An | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mules and hinnies — stocks, Kyrgyzstan or Malta?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 500 An against 294 An in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mules and hinnies — stocks between Kyrgyzstan and Malta?
- 206 An, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Malta rank globally for mules and hinnies — stocks?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 65th and Malta ranks 67th of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and hinnies — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).